Why coronavirus antibody test will not be a panacea

False positive tests and the population differences could make serologic tests not as useful as Trump expected.

Why coronavirus antibody test will not be a panacea

The world is enduring a very painful pandemic and everyone wants to get back to normal life as soon as possible. But the tension between the desire to open up the economy and the twin goals of preventing deaths and not overwhelming our health care system requires a careful plan armed with powerful tools.

One of those tools is measuring antibodies to COVID-19 in peoples’ blood. In the course of most infections, people’s immune systems produce antibodies. For some, but not all, viruses the presence of those antibodies indicates partial or full immunity from reinfection.

The hope is that if we could test everyone’s blood for antibodies, it would tell us who can safely return to work and to social activities and who needs to remain protected. But the utility of such tests depends on two assumptions: The first is that the presence of antibodies grants immunity to infection, and the second is that when an antibody test is positive, it truly means the person has antibodies in their blood.

‘False positive’ tests

In a setting where the prevalence of a disease like COVID-19 is small, then even with serologic tests that are very specific (but falling just short of 100%), many people who have a positive test will not actually have the antibodies. These are termed “false positive” tests.

If those with false positive tests (and no antibody protection) reintegrate, they won’t be safe from acquiring COVID-19. For example, let’s say a test 90% accurate (which is deemed to be pretty accurate in many clinical scenarios) is deployed in a setting where COVID-19 prevalence is only 1%, which in American today would be about 3 million people.

In this setting, assuming every person was tested, 30 million Americans would receive positive results, and of those positive results 27 million would be false positives.

An antibody test for coronavirus in Jena, Germany, on April 3, 2020.

While it seems counterintuitive that a positive result from a test deemed accurate leads to so many false positives, it is because even the slightest degree of misspecification is magnified by the fact that almost no one in the population really has antibodies. The only way to negate the low prevalence is to have a specificity of 100%, which is usually difficult to achieve.

Why serologic test is not useful for now

The question is: What is the actual prevalence of recovery from COVID-19 in the population? If we look at the United States as a whole, as of April 18, there were about 700,000 documented cases, most of whom will recover. We know that this is a drastic underestimate of the true number of cases, but even if it is 10 times larger, the total number is 7 million.

There are 328 million people in the USA, so the prevalence would be 2.1%. With a rate of false positives at 10% or greater, these serologic tests are not as helpful as we would like them to be.

Of course, the prevalence is not uniform across America and Canada. In New York City, the prevalence might be as high as 15-20%, in which case serology will be more useful. But in Montana, the prevalence at this time is likely well below 1%, making the tests not as useful there.

More on COVID-19:Could an old vaccine be a godsend for new coronavirus?

What do we do?

First, to be useful, COVID-19 antibody tests will have to demonstrate that they are extremely specific — in the range of 99% or higher. Some serology tests are performed in laboratories, while others are being marketed for point-of-care use at home or in doctors’ offices. It is likely that the former will have greater specificity and more meaningful results compared with the latter.

Second, for most of the USA at the present time, COVID-19 serology will not be useful for individual counseling. This situation will change as the prevalence of infection grows, but that will take many months.

Rushing point-of-care tests to market is a mistake until we can document and validate that they are very close to 100% specific. And when they are used, the results must be interpreted in the context of the prevalence of prior COVID-19 infection in those communities and settings.

Dr. Allan Detsky is a professor of Health Policy, Managementand Evaluation and Medicine at the University of Toronto. He was physician-in-chief at Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital during the SARS outbreak of 2003. Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious disease physician and scientist at Toronto General Hospital, is associate professor of Medicine at the University of Toronto.

Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/04/23/why-trump-coronavirus-serologic-antibody-testing-not-helpful-now-column/2995905001/

News Related


Trump’s ‘mission accomplished’ moment is premature and deadly. We have not defeated COVID.

Desperate for crowds and adoration, Trump has put his most fervent supporters at risk of getting a deadly disease. Future historians will be astonished. Read more »

NFLPA president JC Tretter says NFL is putting season, players at risk with its coronavirus approach

NFL Players Association president JC Tretter said Tuesday the NFL is putting the 2020 season at risk with its coronavirus approach, calling on the league to better “prioritize player safety.” “Like many other... Read more »

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro says he tested positive for the coronavirus

RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro says he has tested positive for COVID-19 after months of downplaying the virus’ severity. Bolsonaro confirmed the test results while wearing a mask and... Read more »

Venice Film Festival forges ahead amid COVID-19 pandemic with reduced lineup

The show will go on for the Venice Film Festival in September, but with a few modifications due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Organizers said Tuesday that they are pushing forward with plans for... Read more »

Amtrak offers buy-one, get-one promotion on its sleeper trains amid COVID-19 — with a catch

Amtrak wants you to have sweet dreams the next time you travel — so much so that it’s sweetening the deal on its sleeper “roomettes.” The rail service is offering a buy-one-get-one-free discount... Read more »

Florida teen treated with hydroxychloroquine at home before dying of COVID-19, report says

FORT MEYERS, Fla. – The family of a 17-year-old Florida girl who died last month from COVID-19 treated her symptoms at home for nearly a week before taking her to a hospital, a... Read more »

Mookie Betts worried MLB coronavirus testing woes could prevent him from ever playing for Dodgers

During nearly four months away from the game, Mookie Betts said he “stayed away from baseball to keep myself sane.” It’s not hard to understand why. The 2018 American League Most Valuable Player... Read more »

Tom Hanks doesn’t get ‘how common sense has somehow been put into question’ with coronavirus

Read more »

Can Gov. DeSantis force Florida schools to reopen amid the coronavirus pandemic? Some school leaders seem doubtful.

PALM BEACH, Fla. — As concern about the state order spread online, some school leaders said: Not so fast. As Florida educators puzzle over how to start the new academic year, Gov. Ron... Read more »

Texas surpasses 200,000 coronavirus cases after 4th of July holiday weekend

AUSTIN, Texas – Texas reached 200,000 total COVID-19 cases Monday, just 17 days after crossing the 100,000 threshold, a figure that took the state nearly four months to hit. The grim milestone came... Read more »