Which president would you pick to fight coronavirus? Many historians give FDR the nod

Which president would you pick to fight coronavirus? Many historians give FDR the nod

If you were picking the best president in history to battle the coronavirus pandemic, who would you choose?

George Washington, who led his troops through the smallpox pandemic? Abraham Lincoln, who steered the nation through the Civil War? Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who guided the nation through the Great Depression and much of World War II? Or Donald Trump, who is managing the pandemic right now?

Historian Douglas Brinkley, who has written about many of the nation’s presidents, picked Roosevelt.

As a victim of the polio epidemic of the early 20th century, “he really understood how a virus could attack a human body,” Brinkley said. “He was a voice of optimism and reassurance, but not in a blind and foolish way. He would tell the American people what was really happening in his fireside chats.”

In 1933, when 1 in 4 Americans were unemployed, Roosevelt started the Civilian Conservation Corps that provided jobs planting billions of trees and establishing more than 800 parks.

In keeping with that idea, Brinkley said the U.S. needs a medical corps, similar to the Peace Corps and AmeriCorps, to serve as an emergency pandemic force.

“We’re going to have millions who have already had coronavirus who could volunteer and be trained to alleviate some of hospital workplace pressures that are engulfing our country right now,” he said. “Getting Americans to volunteer for public service — that’s the way FDR’s mind would have thought.”

Historian John Barry, who wrote "The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History," pointed to Roosevelt as one with “a proven ability to marshal unprecedented resources and unite the country to confront an emergency, and at the same time the flexibility to shift course if something isn’t working.”

This is a photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt taken on Jan. 19, 1937. Historian Douglas Brinkley, who has written extensively about several presidents, believes FDR would have handled the coronavirus pandemic best because his own battle with polio would have made him empathetic and engaged in solving the crisis.

Woodrow Wilson, who was president during the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918, “had the first two qualities, not the last,” he said. About 675,000 Americans died in the outbreak, which killed 50 million or more worldwide.

More:Trump threatens to permanently cut WHO funding and withdraw US membership

More:Millions more expected to file jobless claims, as coronavirus layoffs wind on

More:In a pandemic, the digital divide separates too many Americans from relief

Historian Patrick J. Maney, who wrote "The Roosevelt Presence: The Life and Legacy of FDR", praised Roosevelt for his empathy. “At Warm Springs (Georgia), he would get in the water with the other polio victims,” he said. “He was one of them.”

He said Roosevelt respected science and “demonstrated before and during World War II how to build a national, bipartisan coalition to fight a war,” appointing two prominent Republicans to his administration: Henry L. Stimson as secretary of war and Frank Knox as secretary of the Navy.

“Can you imagine appointing to your cabinet someone who had been the vice-presidential candidate against you in the last election?” he asked, referring to Knox. “Roosevelt remained the partisan when necessary, but also realized that you could not wage or win a war without national unity.”

For historian Stephanie Rolph, it’s a tossup between Lincoln and Roosevelt. Their strength “lay in their ability to know what they didn’t know,” she said. “Out of that informed leadership came clear directives, unified objectives, and a commitment to long term success.”

She noted that both received “their fair share of criticism, but when the health, welfare, and stability of the nation was at stake the strength of the federal government was the asset best situated to manage the crisis. They knew that, and they unapologetically leveraged that asset.”

Historian Fergus Bordewich, who has written about presidents throughout U.S. history, said Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant and Lyndon B. Johnson all had good qualities to take on the pandemic, but they also had flaws.

The best for such a crisis? Roosevelt, he said. “When he became president in 1933, the economy was in freefall, poverty was metastasizing, there was no national safety net, and Americans widely feared complete social collapse.”

He won the public’s trust as “perhaps the most politically creative president the country has ever had,” he said. “He turned pragmatism into a political art. He sought out the ablest men and a few women as advisors, listened to them and took their advice, … and was always willing to change course when circumstances demanded it.”

Historian Ibram X. Kendi said he would choose the president “who has a proven track record of overcoming a viral crisis, in the Ebola virus, and an economic crisis, in the Great Depression (of 2008). And that president is Barack Obama.”

Historian Ibram X. Kendi said former President Barack Obama's proven track record of overcoming the Ebola crisis and the 2008 economic crisis uniquely qualifies him to handle a coronavirus pandemic.

Historian Diane McWhorter, author of "Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama: The Climactic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution", believes the president who championed major national initiatives—especially civil rights—would be the best president to tackle the pandemic.

Johnson had real empathy and “wouldn’t have seen the COVID-19 pandemic as a social Darwinist choice between money and life,” she said. “Yet he knew how to tie moral imperatives to economic realism, framing his human rights program as a War on Poverty.”

Historian Jonathan Alter believes Jimmy Carter would have been best to prevent the spread of COVID-19. “He would have ramped up protection against the coronavirus from the first word of its outbreak in Wuhan,” he said.

“He was the first president to take disaster preparedness planning seriously and the first to show any interest in global health issues,” said Alter, whose book, "His Very Best: Jimmy Carter, a Life", comes out this fall. “At home, he continued Gerald Ford's vaccination program against swine flu.”

Historian Joseph Ellis, whose books have centered on America’s founding fathers, said the nation’s first president knew how to battle a pandemic.

He had beaten smallpox, which continued to ravage the world. “George Washington’s most strategic decision was to make sure all recruits to the Continental Army were inoculated against smallpox,” Ellis said. “He understood smallpox, disease and contagion.”

Among 20th century presidents, Theodore Roosevelt would be best because no task proved too big for the former Rough Rider. “He built the Panama Canal when nobody thought it could be done,” he said. “He is on Mount Rushmore and deserves to be.”

Historian Gary Wills believes Dwight D. Eisenhower, the general who led the successful D-Day invasion and later became president, would have been best at battling the current pandemic.

“He knew how to read intelligence reports, how to respond to the unexpected, and how to delegate to the right specialists,” he said.

Historian H.W. Brands, who has written about presidents from Lincoln to Ronald Reagan, picked a less likely candidate: Herbert Hoover, who has drawn his share of criticism for his handling of the Great Depression.

“Few presidents were smarter than Hoover; none had more respect for science and experts; and none came even close in demonstrating what he could do in response to a public health crisis,” Brands said. “Hoover headed humanitarian relief efforts in Europe during and after World War I, and in doing so helped save millions of lives.

“Hoover was a genius at organizing and motivating people and agencies in the United States and abroad to work together toward a common goal. Precisely what is needed today.”

Historian Anne Applebaum believes Harry Truman humility, sense of responsibility and ability to innovate would have made him an excellent leader to combat the coronavirus pandemic.

Historian Anne Applebaum believes if Harry Truman were charge of the White House now, “we’d be in much better shape,” she said. “Truman had the three qualities most needed right now: humility and a willingness to take responsibility, as well an ability to innovate, rapidly, on a grand international scale.”

She said Truman rejected flatterers and listened to the experts, following the advice of the sign on his desk: “The buck stops here.”

The same president who created NATO and the Marshall Plan “would have been able to pull together America’s alliances and reinvent global institutions in order to deal with this crisis,” she said. Truman, who understood the early Soviet threat, would have anticipated COVID-19 early as well, she said, “avoiding the disaster that we find ourselves in right now.”

Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/20/coronavirus-historians-best-pandemic-president/5215113002/

News Related


Trump’s ‘mission accomplished’ moment is premature and deadly. We have not defeated COVID.

Desperate for crowds and adoration, Trump has put his most fervent supporters at risk of getting a deadly disease. Future historians will be astonished. Read more »

NFLPA president JC Tretter says NFL is putting season, players at risk with its coronavirus approach

NFL Players Association president JC Tretter said Tuesday the NFL is putting the 2020 season at risk with its coronavirus approach, calling on the league to better “prioritize player safety.” “Like many other... Read more »

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro says he tested positive for the coronavirus

RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro says he has tested positive for COVID-19 after months of downplaying the virus’ severity. Bolsonaro confirmed the test results while wearing a mask and... Read more »

Venice Film Festival forges ahead amid COVID-19 pandemic with reduced lineup

The show will go on for the Venice Film Festival in September, but with a few modifications due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Organizers said Tuesday that they are pushing forward with plans for... Read more »

Amtrak offers buy-one, get-one promotion on its sleeper trains amid COVID-19 — with a catch

Amtrak wants you to have sweet dreams the next time you travel — so much so that it’s sweetening the deal on its sleeper “roomettes.” The rail service is offering a buy-one-get-one-free discount... Read more »

Florida teen treated with hydroxychloroquine at home before dying of COVID-19, report says

FORT MEYERS, Fla. – The family of a 17-year-old Florida girl who died last month from COVID-19 treated her symptoms at home for nearly a week before taking her to a hospital, a... Read more »

Mookie Betts worried MLB coronavirus testing woes could prevent him from ever playing for Dodgers

During nearly four months away from the game, Mookie Betts said he “stayed away from baseball to keep myself sane.” It’s not hard to understand why. The 2018 American League Most Valuable Player... Read more »

Tom Hanks doesn’t get ‘how common sense has somehow been put into question’ with coronavirus

Read more »

Can Gov. DeSantis force Florida schools to reopen amid the coronavirus pandemic? Some school leaders seem doubtful.

PALM BEACH, Fla. — As concern about the state order spread online, some school leaders said: Not so fast. As Florida educators puzzle over how to start the new academic year, Gov. Ron... Read more »

Texas surpasses 200,000 coronavirus cases after 4th of July holiday weekend

AUSTIN, Texas – Texas reached 200,000 total COVID-19 cases Monday, just 17 days after crossing the 100,000 threshold, a figure that took the state nearly four months to hit. The grim milestone came... Read more »